NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES IN INTERNATIONAL COMMON LAW, ECONOMICS, AND INTERNATIONAL POLITICS.docx

Andressa Julia de Almeida Costa

Authors

Andressa Julia de Almeida Costa Fundação Getúlio Vargas https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5758-9675

Keywords:

Public International Law, Nuclear Disarmament, International Political Economy; International Customary Law; International Court of Justice.

Abstract

Nuclear weapons are a recurring concern for global security and international cooperation. Despite multilateral treaties and agreements to control and combat these weapons, states continue to develop new technologies and increase their warheads. In view of this, it is important to research how International Constitutional Law interprets the illegality of atomic bombs, in order to find out if there is normative force related to global practice and to understand some factors that encourage the maintenance and development of nuclear weapons, from the perspective of International Political Economy - IPE, using empirical-qualitative methodology for the analysis of numerical, theoretical and documentary data, as well as the case study of the Marshall Islands.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott KW, Keohane RO, Moravcsik A, Slaughter A-M, Snidal D. The Concept of Legalization. International Organization. 2000;54(3):401-419.
ARON, R. Paz e guerra entre as nações. Brasília: Unb/Ipri, 2002.
CAMPAIGN AGAINST NUCLEAR WEAPONS (ICAN). Surge: 2023 Global nuclear
weapons spending. Switzerland: ICAN, 2024.
DUARTE, S. O desafio do desarmamento nuclear. Folha de S.Paulo. São Paulo, 27 de março de 2011. Disponível em: Acesso em: 12 de junho 2024.
. Um mundo livre de armas nucleares: Aspiração e realidade. RIL Brasília a. 57 n. 225 p. 11-21 jan./mar. 2020.
Federation of American Scientists. Status of World Nuclear Forces. Disponível em: < https://fas.org/initiative/status-world-nuclear-forces >. Acesso em 15 de junho de 2024.
GODOY, Arnaldo S. M. História do Direito Internacional: O Caso Lótus (1927).
Revista de Mestrado em Direito da UCB. Brasília, 2011, p. 41-61.
Koremenos B. Loosening the Ties that Bind: A Learning Model of Agreement Flexibility. International Organization. 2001;55(2):289-325.
LUTMAR, Carmela e CARNEIRO, Cristiane de Andrade Lucena e MITCHELL, Sara McLaughlin. Formal commitments and States’ interests: compliance in international relations. International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations, v. 42, n. 4, p. 559-564, 2016.
NASSER, Salem Hikmat. Fontes e normas do direito internacional: um estudo sobre a soft law - 2. ed, São Paulo. Ed. Atlas, 2006.
NASSER, Salem Hikmat. Os limites do Direito Internacional face à política. Cena Internacional (UnB), v. 8, p. 70-81, 2006.
Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. United Kingdom), Preliminary Objections, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2016, p. 833
STATES invest in nuclear arsenals as geopolitical relations deteriorate—New SIPRI Yearbook out now. SIPRI, 2023. Disponível em: < https://www.sipri.org/media/press- release/2023/states-invest-nuclear-arsenals-geopolitical-relations-deteriorate-new-sipri- yearbook-out-now >. Acesso em 15 de junho de 2024.
TAMANAHA, Brian Z. Legal pluralism across the global South: colonial origins and contemporary consequences. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 53 (2), 168–205. 2021.
TRINDADE, Antônio Augusto Cançado. A obrigação universal de desarmamento nuclear. –Brasília: FUNAG, 2017.
. Princípios do direito internacional contemporâneo – 2. ed. rev. atual. – Brasília: FUNAG, 2017.
___________. Os tribunais internacionais contemporâneos – Brasília: FUNAG, 2013.
WILLIS, Kattie. Theories and practices of development. Second Edition. Routledge, 2011, p. 2-19.