A Construção do Princípio da Autodeterminação dos Povos pela Corte Internacional de Justiça

Caio Cézar Ovelheiro Menna Barreto

doi:10.5281/zenodo.11002156

Caio Cézar Ovelheiro Menna Barreto Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6492-4371

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11002156

Keywords: Principle, Self-determination of peoples, International Court of Justice., Progressive development of international law.

Abstract

The principle of self-determination of peoples is one of the most fundamental interests of the international community. Nevertheless, it is still reason for great controversy, considering the lack of a clear legal definition and of a delimitation of its scope. In light of the uncertainty, the opinions of the International Court of Justice, principal judicial organ of the United Nations, regarding self-determination are crucial to the understanding of this principle that is so important in international law. In effect, the principle of self-determination of peoples has been gradually built in the practice of the Hague Court, either in its specific application in the process of decolonization in Africa and Asia throughout the XX^th century, or in situations beyond the fight against colonial domination. In this context, this paper delves into the decisions of the International Court of Justice concerning the self-determination of peoples in order to identify its contribution to the progressive development of this principle.

References

COMISSÃO DE DIREITO INTERNACIONAL. Draft Articles on State Responsibility with Commentaries thereto adopted by the International Law Commission on First Reading, January 1997. Disponível em: <https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_1996.pdf>. Acesso em: 29 set 2023.

______. Draft Conclusions on Identification and Legal Consequences of Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens), with commentaries, 2022. Disponível em: <https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/1_14_2022.pdf>. Acesso em: 28 set 2023.

CORTE INTERNACIONAL DE JUSTIÇA. Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2010, p. 403.

______. Case concerning the Northern Cameroons (Cameroon v. United Kingdom), Preliminary Objections, Judgment of 2 December 1963: I.C.J. Reports 1963, p. 15.

______. East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1995, p. 90.

______. International status of South-West Africa, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1950, p. 128.

______. Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, Request for Advisory Opinion, 17 January 2023. Disponível em: <https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/186/186-20230119-REQ-01-00-EN.pdf>. Acesso em: 28 set 2023.

______. Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1971, p. 16.

______. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2004, p. 136.

______. Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 2019, p. 95.

______. Relocation of the United States Embassy to Jerusalem (Palestine v. United States of America), Institution of Proceedings, 28 September 2018. Disponível em: <https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/176/176-20180928-APP-01-00-EN.pdf>. Acesso em: 28 set 2023.

______. South West Africa Cases (Ethiopia v. South Africa; Liberia v. South Africa), Preliminary Objections, Judgment of 21 December 1962: I.C.J. Reports 1962, p. 319.

______. South West Africa (Ethiopia v. South Africa; Liberia v. South Africa), Second Phase, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1966, p. 6.

______. Western Sahara, Advisory Opinion, I.C.J. Reports 1975, p. 12.

KOHEN, Marcelo. The Court’s Contribution to Determining the Content of Fundamental Principles of International Law. In: GAJA, Giorgio; STOUTENBURG, Jenny Grote (ed.). Enhancing the Rule of Law through the International Court of Justice. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2012.

OETER, Stefan. Self-Determination. In: SIMMA, Bruno et al. (ed.). The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, Volume I. 3. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

SAUL, Matthew. The Normative Status of Self-Determination in International Law: A Formula for Uncertainty in the Scope and Content of the Right?. Human Rights Law Review. Oxford: Oxford University Press, v. 11, nº 4, 2011.

SPARKS, Tom. Self-Determination in the International Legal System: Whose Claim, to What Right?. Londres: Hart Publishing, 2023.

WIERCZYHSKA, Karolina. Judge Manfred Lachs and His Role in International Adjudication. Baltic Yearbook of International Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, v. 7, 2007.

The Construction of the Principle of Self-Determination of Peoples by the International Court of Justice

Abstract

References